Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Coastal soils:Nutrient management for SAARC countries

Citation: Sen, H.S. (2009). Nutrient management in coastal soils. Paper presented in SAARC Workshop on "Nutrient Use Efficiency in Agriculture", held at CSSRI, Karnal, 9-11 September, 2009.

Nutrient Management in Coastal Soils1
H.S.Sen2

Former Director, Central Research Institute for Jute & Allied Fibres (ICAR), P.O. Barrackpore, Nilganj, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, PIN 700 120
--------------------

Locations of the SAARC countries are shown in the map (Fig. 1). The ratio between coastal length to total land area along with the corresponding data on percent share of agriculture to the total GDP show large variations among different SAARC countries (Table 1). Though it will be oversimplification to try to relate the above ratio to percent share of agriculture to country’s GDP it may not be out of place to give some cognizance, considering the two extremes (Maldives vis-à-vis Nepal and Bhutan), that higher the ratio lower may likely be the contribution of agriculture due to lower
productivity as a result of
several technological and other constraints (Yadav,2007) in the coastal areas,
as compared to the inland areas, in general, in most countries.

Coastal areas are diverse in function and form, dynamic, and do not lend themselves well to definition by strict spatial boundaries. Unlike watersheds, there are no exact natural boundaries that unambiguously delineate coastal areas at the global scale. The world coastline extends from 350,000-1,000,000 km in length, depending upon how finely _____________________________________________________________________________
1 Paper presented at the SAARC Workshop on “Nutrient Use Efficiency in Agriculture”, held at CSSRI, Karnal,
Haryana, India, 9-11 Sptember, 2009
2 Present address for communication: 2/74 Naktala, Kolkata, 700 047, West Bengal, India;
Email: hssen2000@hotmail.com, hssen.india@gmail.com
the ‘length’ is resolved. More comprehensively, the coastal ecosystem has been defined by Sen et al. (2000) as representing the transition from terrestrial to marine influences and vice versa. It comprises not only shoreline ecosystems, but also the upland watersheds draining into coastal waters, and the nearshore sub-littoral ecosystems influenced by land-based activities. Functionally, it is a broad interface between land and sea that is strongly influenced by both.

Soil characteristics of this region are unique and vary widely, depending on their physiographic and climatic conditions. Soil salinity is a major constraint for crop production in the coastal ecosystem. Plant growth is seriously constrained owing to, apart from other factors, various nutritional disorders in plants related to the problems in the coastal soils. This calls for a review of the nature and severity of the problems in soils and plants and to suggest improved nutrient management practices in order to alleviate the adverse situations and obtain higher productivity.

Salient characteristics of coastal soils

In India, of the two coastlines length of the East coast is higher than that of the West. The continental shelf is more stable than the coast. The continental shelf of 0-50 m depth spreads over 1,91,972 sq km and that of 0-200 depth over 4,52,060 sq km area. The shelf is wide (50-340 m) along the East coast. The Exclusive Economic Zone is estimated at 2.02 million sq km. Practically, no systematic study was earlier made to demarcate the coastal soils based on well-defined scientific indices valid for the different sub-ecosystems in this country, and possibly elsewhere. Notable among the past works was that of Yadav et al. (1983) who suggested 3.1 million hectare area (including mangrove forests), while Szabolcs (1979) suggested 23.8 million hectare under coastal salinity in India. In Bangladesh 1.4 million hectare is under coastal area. The coastal saline soil has been used by various workers almost synonymously with coastal soil per se which is not correct since coastal soils are not entirely saline in nature. None of the above estimates appears to have been made on sound scientific basis. However, the latest compilation made by Velayutham et al. (1998) on the soil resources and their potentials for different Agro-ecological Sub Regions (AESR) of India show total 10.78 million hectare area is under this ecosystem (including the islands) in India, which has been the first scientific approach for delineation of the coastal soils. Most of the areas have problematic soils, such as saline, alkaline, acid sulphate and marshy and waterlogged soils, situated in the low-lying flooded/ waterlogged areas, mainly along the deltas.

Saline and sodic soils
In case of the saline soil, the salinity status in soil varies widely from ECe 0.5 dS m-1 in monsoon to 50 dS m-1 in summer. Mostly NaCl followed by Na2SO4 are the dominant soluble salts, with abundance of soluble cations in the order Na>Mg>Ca>K, chloride as the predominant anion, and bicarbonate in traces. In India, the soils are, in general, free of sodicity except in a few pockets in the South and West coast. The saline and sodic soils may be defined as follows:

• Saline soils: Soils having pHs less than 8.5, ESP less than 15, and preponderance of chlorides and sulphates of sodium, calcium and magnesium. ECe should be more than 4 dSm-1 at 25C.
• Sodic soils: Soils having pHs more than 8.5, ESP  15, and preponderance of carbonates and bicarbonates of sodium. The ECe is limitless if originating from salts capable of alkali hydrolysis, otherwise it should be less than 4dSm-1 at 25C.

In coastal and delta regions of major rivers of the world the soils are rich in salts due to the presence of saline ground water table at shallow depth. The coastal delta regions are usually having low elevation and it may also be subjected to frequent brackish water inundation. The groundwater in the region is influenced by sea and the brackish water estuaries. The groundwater reaches the soil surface through capillary rise during dry season, evaporates from the soil leaving salts behind, finally making the soil saline and unproductive for agricultural crops. The soil salinity, thus, shows high temporal and spatial variation depending on the elevation, soil texture, climate (evapo-transpiration, precipitation, wind velocity, relative humidity, etc.), drainage, and other related factors. The ingress of seawater or brackish water, and salt-laden sands blown by sea winds are also greatly responsible for formation of coastal salt-affected soils.

Acid sulphate soils

Many of the coastal soils are developed under coastal swamps and mangrove forests leading to the environment of high organic matter and abundant supply of sulphate salts from the sea. In acid sulphate soils, the production of acid from oxidation of pyrites exceeds the neutralizing capacity of soil and the pH falls below 4. The soils are generally rich in organic matter and clay minerals. The total area of actual and potential acid sulphate soils is rather small: about 10 million hectares are known to occur in the tropics, and the world total probably does not exceed 14 million hectares in South and Southeast Asia, West and Southern Africa, and along the South American and Australian coastlines. In addition, some 20 million hectares of coastal peats, mainly in Indonesia, are underlain by potential acid sulphate soil.

Acid sulphate soils develop as a result of the drainage of soils that are rich in pyrites (FeS2), which on oxidation, produce sulphuric acid in presence of excess SO42— ions in soil.

4 FeS2 + 15 O2 + 14 H2O  4 Fe(OH)3 + 8SO4-- + 16H+

12FeS2 + 45O2 + 30 H2O + 4K+  4KFe3(SO4)2.(OH)6 + 16 SO4-- + 36H+
(Soil pyrite) (Jarosite)

Pyrites accumulate in waterlogged soils that are both rich in organic matter and dissolved sulphates.
2Fe2O3 + 8 SO42- + 16CH2O + O2  4 FeS2 + 16 HCO3- + 8 H2O
(From (From (Soil org. (Diss- (Pyrites)
soil) sea water matter) olved
or soil) oxygen)

The growth of most dry land crops on acid sulphate soils is hampered by the toxic levels of iron and aluminium and the low availability of phosphorus. Toxic levels of dissolved iron plus low phosphorus are the most important adverse factors for wetland rice. In the near-neutral potential acid sulphate soils (Sulfaquents, Sulfic Fluvaquents) high salinity, poor bearing capacity, uneven land surface, and the risk of strong acidification during droughts are the main disadvantages. Young acid sulphate soils (Sulfaquepts), in which the pyritic substratum occurs, near the surface are often more acidic than those soils (Sulfic Tropaquepts, Sulfic Haplaquets) in which this horizon is found at greater depths.


Factors affecting nutrient availability and suggested management strategies

Additions of N and P generally increase the growth of plants grown in N- and P-deficient environments, provided that the plant is not experiencing severe salt stress. When salinity and nutrient deficiency are both factors limiting growth, relief of the most limiting factor will promote growth more than the relief of the less limiting factor. Therefore, addition of a limiting nutrient can either increase, decrease, or have no effect on relative plant tolerance to salinity, depending on the level of salt stress. Failure to account for the severity of salt stress when interpreting salinity x nutrient interactions has caused considerable confusion among researchers in the past.

Poor transformation and availability of nutrients are influenced by high soil and water salinity and other adverse soil properties including inhospitable biological environment, specific ion effects, ion antagonisms and toxicities, etc. In wet acid sulphate soils excess water soluble iron, aluminium, hydrogen sulphide and organic substances, especially fatty acids, are common examples to affect crop growth, particularly rice. Besides, there are other location-specific problems related to nutrient management, viz. highly leached low-fertility lateritic soils with severe erosion problem along with undulating topography, etc.

Physico-chemical factors

Saline and Sodic soils

Nitrogen: Most of the coastal saline soils are deficient in nitrogen. Besides lesser utilization of nitrogeneous fertilizers, especially in coastal areas, the mineralization of soil organic nitrogen, and thus the release of native soil nitrogen to the plant available form, is also slowed down in the salt-affected soils due to decrease in the population as well as activity of microbes with increase in soil salinity. It was revealed from a study at CSSRI, Regional Station Canning that the rates of both mineralization and immobilization of nitrogen in soil were considerably reduced at soil salinity of ECe 10 dSm-1 and above. The increasing loss of nitrogen through NH3 volatilization from applied nitrogeneous fertilizer with increase in soil salinity was studied under field condition at Canning. While comparing among different sources at two soil salinity levels, viz. ECe 3-4 and 7-8 dSm-1, the loss was found to be maximum under ammonium sulphate, followed by prilled urea, and minimum under placement of urea (in paper packet) at 5 cm depth, whereas the conventional slow-release sources as lac-coated urea, sulphur-coated urea, and placement of urea briquette occupied the intermediate positions. Reduction in the loss when compared with prilled urea broadcast under cropped condition was maximum (73.1%) for placement of urea.

Phosphorus: The level of phosphorus in the coastal saline soils is highly variable, and depends largely on the nature and degree of salinity. The availability of soil phosphorus largely depends on the pH of the soil developed after hydrolosis of salt. An increase in soil pH on hydrolysis reduces the availability of soil phosphorus. Very little work has been done on the transformation and availability of P to crops in coastal saline soils.

Potassium: The availability of potassium depends largely on the parent material, clay minerals and weathering conditions. It also depends on the nature and amount of salts in the soil. It was reported from CSSRI, Regional Station Canning that the coastal saline soils are rich in water soluble, exchangeable, non-exchangeable and available K.
Thus, with regard to soil fertility, the coastal soils are usually rich in available K and micronutrients (except Zn), low to medium in available N, and are variable in available P status (Bandyopadhyay et al., 1985, Bandyopadhyay, 1990, Maji and Bandyopadhyay, 1991). Major portion of the applied N fertilizer is lost through volatilization (Sen and Bandyopadhyay, 1987).
Micronutrients: Work done so far on the role of micronutrients in coastal saline soils is meagre. The soils are generally rich in micronutrients, such as Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B and Mo. In the coastal sands of Andhra Pradesh in India the soils are deficient in Zn as well as in N, P and K. Iron chlorosis is common to crops like sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L), jowar (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench), rainfed rice (Oryza sativa L.), etc. As a remedial measure for iron deficiency common in upland rice nurseries, spray of iron salts has been suggested. Such symptoms are also common in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), Cressandra undulaefolia Salisb., etc. In Andhra Pradesh salinity accentuated the zinc deficiency. Along with Zn, P deficiency is also reported from the red and deltaic black soils in this state. High amount of CaCO3 (up to 15%) is congenial to Zn and Fe deficiency disorders. High dose of Zn application is recommended in rice as foliar spray. Zn deficiency was noted from various laterite and lateritic soils in other coastal states in India also. Besides, Al and Fe toxicities too have been reported from a few acid lateritic soils along the coast.
Long term study: Long term field experiment in coastal saline soils in India showed that rice and wheat yield could be maintained with 50% NPK used in conjunction with FYM or green manure (DARE, 2003-04). In another detailed long term experiment conducted (CSSRI, 1990) in Sundarbans (India) it was observed that grain yield of crops in a rice-barley rotation increased significantly only due to the application of N. Application of P did not show any significant increase in the yield of crops in the initial 8 years, after which the yield of barley alone increased due to P application. Available K content was high in the soil. The experiments conducted so far showed that a basal dose of 11 kg P ha-1 for rice and 5.5 kg P ha-1 for barley or for similar upland crops should maintain the fertility status of the soil, whereas the K application may be omitted without any detrimental effect on soil fertility or crop growth. The K removal by the crop was compensated by K added through accumulation and release of non-exchangeable sources.
Acid sulphate soils
In Sri Lanka addition of Gliricidia muculata in combination with phosphate and a small dose of inorganic fertilizer was effective to secure high rice yields (Deturckl et al., http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Internet/webdocs/ilri-publicaties/publicaties/Pub53/pub53-h8.pdf). In India, for the coastal acid sulphate soils of Sundarbans, application of lime, superphosphate and rock phosphate have been found beneficial in improving the soil properties and rice growth (Bandyopadhyay, 1989). Application of Ca-rich oystershell, which is available in plenty, was found beneficial, if applied in powdered form, as an inexpensive alternative soil ameliorating agent. In this soil continuous submergence for one year could not improve the soil properties substantially.
Mongia et al. (1989), while reporting for two soils in Andaman Islands observed that application of lime and phosphorus may be beneficial for lowland rice. In another study on mangrove (Avecenia marina) muds in this island, it has been reported that liming significantly depressed the concentrations of Al, Mn and Fe. Exchangeable Al content also decreased with lime application. The depression of exchangeable Al may be due to precipitation of trivalent Al and Al (OH)3 in the presence of high concentration of OH- ions. Lime application, in general, also reduced the exchangeable and extractable Fe contents of the soil.
In the rice-based systems of the Mekong Delta in Viet Nam, there is a trend towards replacing the traditional rice double cropping with a rotation of wet season rice and dry season upland crops (vegetables and tuber crops). However, under the prevailing acid sulphate soils, the build-up of excessive concentrations of exchangeable aluminium (Al3+) during the aerobic soil phase strongly limit upland cropping to few relatively Al-tolerant tuber crops that farmers grow on raised beds to enhance Al3+ leaching process. Study was conducted on the performance of major tuber crops (cassava, sweet potato and yam) in relation to soil exchangeable Al3+ concentration and as affected by the application of locally produced biogas sludge on farmers’ fields on a typical acid sulphate soil with observation plots laid out on raised beds and the same categorised based on the initial exchangeable Al3+ content of the topsoil in classes of <10, 10–15, and >15 meq Al3+ per 100g. Biogas sludge was applied at 3 Mg ha−1 (dry matter) to tuber crops and compared with an unamended control. It was found that biogas sludge tended to reduce soil exchangeable Al3+ concentrations but significantly increased the tolerance to given Al concentrations with higher tuber yield and P uptake in all tuber crops. However, Al-tolerant cassava showed stronger responses to amendment than Al-sensitive yam. It was concluded that in the absence of soil liming, the application of organic wastes can improve the performance of Al-tolerant while permitting the cultivation of more Al-sensitive crop on acid sulphate soils. Further research aims at identifying most appropriate substrate types and application rates for specific acid soil conditions and (Saleh et al., http://www.tropentag.de/2005/abstracts/links/Saleh_gFbcXBF1.pdf) crop tolerance levels.

Inundated and flooded soils

A flood is an overflow or accumulation of an expanse of water that submerges land. In the sense of ‘flowing water’, the word may also be applied to the inflow of the tide. ‘Coastal flood’ is caused by severe sea storms, or as a result of other hazards (e.g. tsunami or hurricane). The problems of maintaining these areas are accentuated by naturally rising sea levels due to global climate change. Very often the problem becomes much more severe with increase in salinity in the flood water caused by breaching or overflowing of the sea dykes, etc. Flooding thus causes significant change in soil properties depending on the soil, hydrological properties of the flood water, and duration of flood. Among others the most significant changes in soil properties of relevance to plant growth are silt deposition, accumulation of salts, erosion of top soil, organic C status in soil, depletion of soil oxygen ─ resulting in lack of plant metabolic activities and overall reduced soil atmosphere causing significant change in soil nutrient dynamics.

Soil-and plant-produced C2H4 were suggested as factors in reducing root permeability and increasing resistance to water uptake by tobacco (Hunt et al., 1981). It has been reported that soil flooding stress may severely reduce water and ion uptake directly by increasing the permeability of roots to water and indirectly by reducing the size and volume of the plant roots, as well as by decreasing the ion uptake per unit weight of roots. Such uptake implies a disruption in root metabolism and reducing the effective root surface area available for ion uptake. Many such evidences indicate that dysfunction in nutrient absorption by roots under flooding conditions is largely caused by lack of O2 and attendant deleterious metabolic effects. The accumulation of dioxygen in the earth’s atmosphere allowed for evolution of aerobic organisms that uses O2 as the terminal electron acceptor, thus providing a higher yield of energy compared with fermentation and anaerobic respiration. For example, in aerobic metabolism, the complete breakdown of one molecule of glucose yields a total of 38 molecules of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), whereas the anaerobic breakdown of this same glucose molecule to ethanol and CO2 yields only 8 molecules of ATP (Scandalios, 1993). Oxygen stress may inhibit guttation either by increasing the root resistance to water movement or by inhibition of ion transport to the xylem and arrest of vegetation and reproductive growth.

Flooding X Salinity interactions on H2S gas evolution: Bandyopadhyay et al. (1995) measured H2S production in coastal saline and flooded rice field in Sundarbans, West Bengal, India. They observed that sulphates constitute about 40-50 percent of salts in these soils undergoing reduction reactions resulting in transformation of sulphate salts into sulphides including H2S gas which is toxic to plants. It was estimated that during peak periods about 390 to 1180 cm3 of H2S gas per m2 per 24 hours (day time) escaped to the atmosphere from waterlogged rice field, extent of which depended on the soil salinity (ECe 5-9 dSm-1) values and dose of green manure (Sesbania aculeata) applied (0-5 Mg ha-1) in the experiment. Higher soil salinity and application of green manure increased the production of H2S. The concentration of P and micronutrients in both shoot and root of rice decreased considerably at higher concentration of H2S in irrigation water. The insoluble sulphides precipitated on root surfaces (Table 2) and possibly interfered with the growth and nutrient uptake by plants. The acid soluble metallic sulphide (FeS equivalent) content of soil increased from 221 mg per kg soil to 381 mg per kg soil as the H2S content of irrigation water increased from 0 to 80 ppm. The primary cationic constituent of the precipitate on root was Fe, the solubility of which increased considerably after submergence of soil accompanied by a sharp fall in the redox potential. It was inferred that besides the direct toxic effect of H2S gas the indirect effect of sulphate reduction in interfering with the nutrient uptake by plants was also responsible for decrease in yield of rice.

Table 2. Nutrient content in the extract of root coating (10 g fresh root per 20 ml 6N HCl) and the insoluble metallic sulphides (FeS equivalent) in soil at flowering stage of rice in pot culture experiment
H2S in irr. water
(ppm) Soil salinity, ECe 7.4 dSm-1 Soil salinity, ECe 3.8 dSm-1
Insol.
sulp.
(mg kg-1 soil) Conc. in the extract of root coating (ppm) Insol. sulp.
(mg kg-1 soil) Conc. in the extract of root coating (ppm)
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
0 221 2913 63 68 13 204 2217 52 71 11
20 253 8492 121 142 22 244 7992 98 125 20
40 280 11948 144 181 24 265 10731 127 174 20
60 310 15316 175 218 26 309 14986 160 215 25
80 381 17723 225 268 32 355 17265 196 257 30
LSD
(p=0.05) 26 150 4 5 3 21 161 4 6 2
Adapted from Bandyopadhyay et al., 1995

Biological factors

It is not only the physico-chemical property of soil that is adversely affected by salinity and alkalinity, the soil biology is also highly affected by presence of excess salts in soil, and this, in turn, would affect nutrient availability.

Saline soils

In general, the biological activity of soil microorganisms is low in salt-affected soils due to high salt content. Carbon dioxide evolution and microbial count in soil decrease at higher concentration of salts. There is decrease in free living diazotroph and nitrogenase activity with increasing soil salinity. The inhibition effect also varied with kind of salt being more with Ca and Na type of salts than with K and Mg type of soils among the cations. Among the anions the adverse effect was more with CO3 and Cl salts than with SO4 type of salts. Initial total microbial count of heavy clay saline soil has been reported to have increased (Mahmoud et al., 1972) after reclamation (Table 3). Enzymatic activity in soil also decreases due to increase in soil salinity. The low biological activity of saline soil is largely due to the osmotic and ionic stress induced by salts. In saline soils organic amendments may improve the biological activity up to the salinity level of ECe 26 dSm-1. Thus, there is an urgent need of applying organic matter to saline and sodic soils for their efficient management. At higher salinity, the osmotic and specific ion effects predominate over organic matter in influencing the biological activities in soil. Thus, addition of organic matter alone may not be enough to improve the biological activity. It has been observed that desalinization immediately increases the biological activity, although not completely restored.

One of the most efficient ways of increasing the N status and sustaining crop production in the salt-affected soils is to exploit the benefit of biological N fixation, specially by cultivation of annual and perennial legumes in crop rotation, application of azolla and non-symbiotic N fixing bacteria, etc. Rhizobium spp. show considerable tolerance to high pH and can thrive well in sodic soils but these are considerably sensitive to salinity. Though Rhizobia could thrive and multiply in sodic soil with pH as high as 10.0 the effective contribution of the bacteria towards N-fixation reduces because of sensitivity of the host plants to salinity of soil. Nodulation may be reduced at soil salinity (ECe) as low as 5.0 dSm-1 in barseem (Trifolium alexandrnum), while nodulation was delayed and ineffective nodules were produced in the crop at ECe 15.0 dSm-1 (Bhardwaj, 1975). Legume crops vary in their nodulation performance on different soils (Table 4). Nodulation and N-fixation increase considerably after reclamation of the soils. No nodule may be formed on root when total soluble salt content of soil is about 5.16%. Application of phosphate fertilizer shows improvement in nodulation, and the phosphate x salinity interaction is found significant (Bajpai and Gupta, 1979). At moderate salinity level of ECe 5.0 dSm-1, application of 100 kg P2O5 ha-1 gave symbiotic performance similar to the application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 in normal soil. The performance of some forage legumes with Rhizobium spp. (Barseem with: Trifolium alexandrinum, Shaftal with: T. resupinatum, Lucerne with: Medicago sativa, and Senji with: Melilotus parviflora) tested under different soil salinity conditions shows that the mean nodule number, weight and yield of legumes reduced with increase in soil salinity (Table 5). There exists a considerable variation among the Rhizobium spp. in their tolerance to salinity. For example, there may be complete inhibition of barseem Rhizobia as has been obsreved by Pillai and Sen (1966) at 0.5- 0.7% NaCl in culture media, whereas strains from Dolichos showed highest growth at 0.7-1.2 % (Pillai and Sen, 1973). However, addition of organic material (green manure, FYM, etc.) or gypsum to soil may greatly improve the proliferation of Rhizobia.

Effect of salinity on the microbial and biochemical parameters of the salt-affected soils in Sundarbans (India) was studied at nine different sites. The study revealed that the average microbial biomass C (MBC), average basal soil respiration (BSR), and average fluorescein diacetate hydrolyzing activity (FDHA) were lowest during the summer season, indicating the adverse effect of soil salinity (Tripathi et al., 2006). It was suggested that integrated nutrient management should be very effective for increasing its use efficiency for higher and sustainable yield of crops (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2006, Tripathi et al., 2007). Bandyopadhyay and Rao (2001) were of the opinion to introduce systems approach involving organic, inorganic and biofertlizers compatible with the farmers’ practice. In coastal soil at Tamil Nadu (India), application of agro-industrial wastes significantly improved soil organic carbon, pH, EC and soil bacteria, fungus and actinomycetes population and enhanced the soil fertility status (macro and micro nutrients) and improved the crop productivity of finger millet. Application of pressmud @12.5 t ha-1 recorded better growth and yield of finger millet followed by composted coirpith @ 12.5 t ha-1 (Rangaraj et al., 2007).

Sodic soils

Sodic soils show low urease activity, but high pH does not affect the ammonifying or ureolytic bacteria as much as it affects the nitrifiers which are highly sensitive to both salinity and alkalinity. Production of ammonia from urea may not be affected although nitrification may be severely affected by NaCl, Na2SO4 or CaCl2. However, urease activity is also reduced at higher pH but enhanced with organic carbon content of soil. Among the nitrifiers Nitrobacter is more sensitive than Nitrosomonas. Both salinity and alkalinity do not show marked influence on the growth of Actinomycetes, but fungi and Azotobacter are very sensitive. Blue green algae are tolerant to high pH. Sulphur oxidizing bacteria, Thiobacillus thiooxidans and T. novellas, and iron-sulphur oxidizing bacteria, T. ferrooxidans, have been isolated from sodic soils (Rupela and Tauro, 1973), although their activities are poor. High concentration of sodium chloride inhibits nitrogen fixation by Azotobacter, and the strains isolated from saline soil are less inhibited than others. Negative correlation exists between the Diazotrophic bacteria and salinity (Hassouna et al., 1995). On the other hand, Azospirillum, a non-symbiotic root associative nitrogen fixing bacteria may be recommended as a bio-fertilizer up to total soluble salt content of 2500 ppm in soil. Growth of non-symbiotic bacteria and their N fixation may be improved by application of chemical amendments and phosphatic fertilizers to sodic soils.
Blue Green Algae (BGA) can be used to reclaim the sodic soils due to their ability to secrete organic acids and immobilize Na in the biomass. Though some contradictory reports are available it is true that blue green algae increase the organic matter and N content of saline and sodic soils. Azolla, the water fern, having symbiotic association with BGA, can be grown as a pioneer plant to improve the health, N status, and reclamation of salt-affected soils. By cultivating azolla for a few successive years, the salt content of saline soils may be decreased considerably. The desalinization rate is 1.8 times higher than leaching through water, or 2.1 times than desalinization through Sesbania incorporation (Shang et al.,1987).

Phosphate solubulizing bacteria do not show much effect on the available P status of sodic soil, whereas VAM (vesicular-arbuscular micorrhizae) can grow with their extensive hyphal network up to a salinity level of 12 dSm-1. It may also help the plants in scavenging phosphorus, nitrogen, sulphur and micronutrients in salt-affected soils. The data in Table 6 show that inoculation with VAM resulted in significant increase in VAM colonization of wheat roots and VAM spore count in sodic soil (pH 8.8) over uninoculated controls. The increase in Olsen’s P, as a result P application, inhibits VAM colonization and spores. A positive relation (r=0.74) exists between the VAM colonization and soil available P which indicates mobilization of P by VAM. The inoculation with Glomus mossae and native VAM results in increase in wheat yields. These was no significant increase in P content of both straw and grain as a result of inoculation with VAM in treatments without P application. The inoculation with VAM results in significant increase in Zn content of grain and a positive relation has been reported between the Zn content and VAM in roots.

Table 6. Effect of inoculation with VAM cultures and P application on wheat yield,
available P, VAM spores and % VAM colonization of roots

P level VAM Culture Available P Wheat yield (g pot-1) VAM spores %VAM P Zn
(mg kg-1) Straw Grain (10 g-1) Colonisation - (kg ha-1)-
0 None 4.8 19.3 13.6 17.0 9.7 2.2 53.3

0 Glomus mossae
6.3
24.4
17.6
22.4
76.1
2.1
48.5
0 Native VAM 6.0 24.6 13.6 19.9 59.2 2.2 51.8
40 None 21.5 24.6 17.5 18.7 2.0 3.0 21.5

40 Glomus mossae
19.4
25.6
15.3
10.7
44.5
3.5
36.6
40 Native VAM
17.1 24.3 17.3 15.5 18.4 3.4 36.8
CD (P=0.05) P 1.2 0.7 1.0 NS 5.7 0.2 4.5
VAM NS 0.9 NS NS 7.0 NS 5.5
P X VAM 2.2 1.3 1.8 NS 9.9 NS NS
Source: Sharma and Swarup (1996)
Use of green manure crops like Sesbania spp. (S. aculeata) has been proved very suitable for saline sodic soils (Keating and Fisher, 1985, Rao, 1986, Evans and Rotar, 1986). In favourable climate with proper management, these crops accumulate well over 100 kg N ha-1, mostly through biological N fixation, in 50-55 days, thereby increasing the yield of the following rice crop significantly (Singh et al., 1991). Likewise, application of green leaves of Glyricidia maculata @ 10 tonne ha-1 to the puddled soil before rice transplanting has been found comparable in terms of yield with inorganic fertilizer application of N, P and K at 100, 50 and 50 kg ha-1, respectively (Chavan and Dongale, 1994). Buresh and De Datta (1991), however, were of the view that leguminous green manure and its residue normally are able to meet only partially the N requirement for the following high yielding rice variety. They focused attention on the high loss of N under the anaerobic-aerobic soil cycles typical of legume-lowland rice sequence, as well as under higher production of methane and nitrous oxide from the lowland rice field. However, in view of rising energy cost and limited input availability, recycling of organic wastes and use of renewable sources of biofertilizers, viz. rhizobium cultures for pulse or legume, and blue-green algae for waterlogged rice field may play a significant role in terms of integrated nutrient management for rice in coastal saline soils (Kundu and Pillai, 1992).
Soil quality
The importance of improved soil quality in the coastal plains through higher SOC level of the soils was highlighted by Mandal et al. (2008). Very recently, IRRI characterized lowland rice soils (excluding deepwater rice) in Asia in respect of soil quality (Haefele and Hijmans, 2009), and the study included large areas under coastal plains (Fig. 2). They grouped soil qualities into four categories. These were: Good, Poor, Very Poor and Problem soils. ‘Good’ and ‘Poor soils’ represent those with different degrees of weathering but without major constraints; ‘Very Poor’ represents soils with multiple chemical constraints (acidity, deficiency of phosphorous, or toxicities of iron and aluminum); while ‘Problem soils’ represent those with the most frequently cited soil problems, including acid sulphate, peat, saline, and alkaline soils, which partly cause low fertility, and partly soil chemical toxicity.
Nutritional disorder in plants

Nitrogen: Under salt-stress conditions, the uptake of N by crop plants is generally affected (Alam, 1999). A substantial number of laboratory and greenhouse studies have shown that salinity reduces N accumulation in plants. It has been reported that an increase in Cl- uptake and accumulation is accompanied by a decrease in shoot nitrate concentration. In their experiment, Aslam et al. (1984) have reported that Cl- inhibited NO3- uptake more than SO42- when these anions were present on an equal osmolarity basis. In contrast to the effect of Cl- on NO3- uptake, reported data indicated that increased NO3- in the substrate decreased Cl- uptake and accumulation. The possible decrease in N uptake by increasing salinity has been partly attributed to a probable substitution of Cl- for NO3-. Both the chloride salts of Na and K inhibited the nitrate uptake similarly, suggesting that the process was more sensitive to anionic salinity than to cationic salinity (Aslam et al.,1984). Although, Cl- salts were primarily responsible for reduced NO3- uptake by plants, NO3- reduction in plants was not affected by salinity in studies with barley (Aslam et al.,1984).

Salinity also stimulated nitrate reductase activity in peanut plants but decreased the nitrate reductase activity in tomato and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) plants. Reduction in NRA may be due to inhibition of NO3-uptake by Cl- in plant species (Abdul-Kadir and Paulsen, 1982) .

Potassium, Sodium, Calcium & Magnesium: The higher K/Na ratio in shoots of barley cultivars compared with that in root medium solution indicated selective uptake of K, which seems to be among the processes involved in tolerance of cultivars to salinity stress (Alam, 1999, Niazi et al., 1992). Addition of K suppressed the uptake of other cations by rice and tomato plants in the order of Na>Mg>Ca. The depression of Na uptake by K could be due to the antagonism between the two cations. It is widely recognized that a high Na concentration inhibits K uptake by plants. On the other hand, Na appeared to stimulate the K uptake by plants.

Salinity stress has significant inhibitory effects on the concentrations of K, Ca, and Mg as well as stimulatory effects of these nutrient elements on different crop plants (Alam,1999). With the increasing concentration of NaCl salts, K concentration decreased in the leaves, stems and roots, and was accompanied by a substantial increase of Na in the organs.

In lowland rice plants adapt to saline conditions and avoid dehydration by reducing the osmotic potential of plant cells. Antagonistic effects on nutrient uptake may occur, causing deficiencies, particularly of K and Ca under conditions of excessive Na content. For example, Na is antagonistic to K uptake in sodic soils with moderate to high available K, resulting in high Na:K ratio in the rice plant and reduced K transport rates. Sodium-induced inhibition of Ca uptake and transport limits shoot growth. Increasing salinity inhibits nitrate reductase activity, decreases chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate, and increases the respiration rate and N content in the plant. Plant K and Ca contents decrease but the concentrations of NO3-N, Na, S, and Cl in shoot tissue increase.

The factors related to nutrient disorder that affect different rice varieties are:
• Differences in nutrient uptake under Na stress: Tolerant cultivars have a narrower Na:K ratio (higher K uptake) and greater leaf Ca2+ content than susceptible cultivars.
• Efficient exclusion of Na+ and Cl-: Salt-tolerant rice varieties have a reduced Na+ and Cl- uptake compared with less tolerant cultivars.

Calcium plays a vital nutritional and physiological role in plant metabolism. Calcium, which like K also is an essential mineral nutrient, helps in maintaining membrane integrity, is important in senescence processes, and is known to counteract the harmful effects of Na on crops (Lahaye and Epstein, 1971). Plant growth is dependent on Ca2+, and both cell division and cell elongation processes are affected by the Ca2+ ion concentration.

The presence of Ca2+ as the dominant cation in agricultural soils generally ensures that the absolute Ca2+ level is not a primary growth-limiting factor. As salinity increases, the requirement of plants for Ca2+ increases. The uptake of Ca2+ from the soil solution may decrease because of ion interactions, precipitation, and increases in ionic strength that reduce the activity of Ca2+. In citrus, Ca was found to be effective in reducing the transport of both Na and Cl from the roots to leaves. Maintaining an adequate supply of Ca2+ in the soil solution is an important factor in controlling the severity of specific ion toxicities.

The magnesium content of the leaves of saline-treated bean plants increased, whereas it decreased in the root. Hodson et al. (1982) found potentially toxic concentrations of Mg in salt-marsh soil solution samples and demonstrated that a salt-marsh clone, Agrostis stolonifera, was considerably more tolerant to Mg2+ than was an inland clone. Magnesium concentration of avocado leaves was decreased with an increase in the exchangeable Na in the soil. In rice, Mg transport to the tops was suppressed by Na compared with Mg uptake (Song and Fujiwara, 1996). The Mg content in the roots revealed the competition between Mg and Na uptake and transport to the tops (Alam, 1999, Alfocea et al., 1993).

Phosphorus: Phosphorus, which has a crucial role in the energy metabolism of cells, is involved in a number of anabolic and catabolic pathways (Alam, 1999). A recent study indicates that salinity may increase the P requirement of certain plants. Awad et al. (1990) found that when NaCl increased in the substrate from 10 to 50 or 100 mM, the P content in the tomato leaf increased from 58 to 70 and 97 mmol kg-1 dry weight. The influence of salinity on P accumulation in crop plants is variable and depends on the plant and experimental conditions. In many cases, salinity decreased the P concentration in plant tissue (Sharpley et al., 1992). It is unlikely that Cl and H2PO4 ions are competitive in terms of plant uptake. However, it has also been observed that Cl may have a suppressing effect on P uptake in tomato shoots (Papadopoulos and Rendig, 1983). The presence of Cl as well as SO4 reduced P uptake in barley and sunflower plants. In other cases, a reduction in plant P concentration by salinity may result from the reduced activity of P in the soil solution due to the high ionic strength of the growth media (Awad et al.,1990). Phosphate solubility and its availability are reduced in saline soils not only because of ionic strength effects that reduce the activity of phosphate but also because the P concentration in soil solution is tightly controlled by sorption processes and by the low solubility of Ca-P minerals. It is, therefore, understandable that P concentrations in field-grown agronomic crops decreased as salinity increased in the media. When plants are P-deficient, they may be more sensitive to salinity (Sharpley et al., 1992).

Gibson (1988) observed that adequate phosphorus nutrition was essential for effective ion compartmentation by contributing to efficient carbohydrate utilization in salt-stressed wheat.

Micronutrients: The concentrations of micronutrients in the soil solutions, with the exception of Cl, seem to be low and depend on the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil bodies. The availability of most micronutrients depends on the pH of the soil solution as well as the nature of binding sites on organic and inorganic particle surfaces. In saline soils, the solubility of micronutrients such as Fe, Mn, Zn and Cl is particularly low and plants grown in these soils often experience deficiencies in these elements (Alam, 1999, Page et al., 1990). Nevertheless, the micronutrient concentration in plant shoots may increase, decrease, or have no effect depending on the type of plant tissue, salt tolerance of plant species, salinity, micronutrient concentration, environmental conditions, and/ or abrupt changes in the permeability of the crop cell membranes.

Both Fe and Mn contents were reported to increase in all parts of the salt-treated peanut plants (Chavan and Karadge, 1980). The increase in Fe contents was more prominent than that of Mn. Salinity increased the Fe concentration in the shoots of pea and rice and decreased its concentration in the shoots of barley and corn (Hassan et al., 1970).

A range of soil conditions have been associated with binding of Zn in less plant available forms: high pH (7.0), prolonged submergence and low redox potential common in coastal soils, high organic matter and bicarbonate content, high Mg:Ca ratio, and high available P. Perennial wetness and low redox potential are the major causes of Zn deficiency in peat and coastal saline soils (Neue and Lantin, 1994; Quijano-Guerta et al., 2002). One remarkable feature of Zn-deficiency tolerance in rice is that the trait seems to be associated with tolerance of other abiotic stresses. Rice germplasm identified with tolerance of Zn deficiency from large-scale screening at IRRI often showed cross-tolerance of salinity, P deficiency, and peat soils (Quijano-Guerta et al., 2002). The reasons behind this cross-tolerance are still unknown and could be attributed to better Zn acquisition when Zn is the most limiting factor.

Boron is highly toxic to almost all plants. Sensitive plants may be affected at concentrations > 0.50 gm-3 in soil saturation extract (Maas, 1986).

Future research options for improved nutrient management
A. Adequate phosphorus nutrition has been found essential for effective ion compartmentation by contributing to efficient carbohydrate utilization in salt-stressed plants. P translocation from roots to young shoots should increase in the presence of an additional supply of Ca2+. An increased Ca2+ supply to the plant could be more efficient than P fertilization itself in restoring the P supply to young tissues under saline conditions.
B. Elevated Ca2+ levels may protect the plant from NaCl toxicity by reducing the displacement of membrane-associated Ca2+ by reducing Na+ uptake and transport to the shoots or by a combination of these effects. Ca2+ also improves K+ uptake under NaCl salinity, effectively improving on the Na/K value in the tissues. An increase in the Cl- concentration, on the other hand, in the nutrient media may lead to a reduction in the NO3 content of plants, observed in case of tomato. Under saline conditions, a high Ca2+ supply should alleviate the inhibition of NO3 uptake and increase Na/K selectivity.
C. Supplementation of Ca2+ may also improve the growth rate of the plants in the NO3 treatment based on which it may be suggested that NO3- is possibly a better N source than NH4+.
D. In coastal flooded saline soils measures should be taken to reduce volatilization loss, in particular, either through placement of N-source (urea) at sub-surface depth, through application of slow release source, through use of urease inhibitor, or by adjusting the time of application coinciding with the plants’ active growth stage, for higher N-uptake.
E. Under flooded condition, soil organic matter contributes to Fe and Mn availability through the formation of metallo-organic complexes with organic substances. This phenomenon may be attributed to the production of chelating agents from compost that generally keep the micronutrient elements soluble and, consequently, more available to crop plants. Increased Fe and Mn solubility in flooded soils benefits rice, which has a higher requirement for these elements, than other plants. There is concomitant increase in pH, CO32-, and DTPA extractable Fe and Mn on the submergence of a lowland rice plants.
F. Under flooded conditions, the production of organic complexing compounds and reductions of Fe and Mn tend to enhance the solubility of Zn and Cu in the growth media. Contradictory results are also, however, available. When a soil undergoes reduction by flooding, the breakdown of Fe and Mn oxides may provide an increased surface area with a high adsorptive capacity onto which Cu and Zn may be firmly adsorbed in some soils. Thus, long-term flooding of noncalcareous soils though generally tends to increase the availability of Cu and Mo may depress that of Zn. Deficiency may also occur primarily during early growth of the crop due to immobilization of Zn in roots by bicarbonate ions that are produced in alkaline soils soon after submergence with increase in CO2 concentration in soil.
G. Plant roots and their interaction with the different abiotic and biotic soil components represent a key point in the acquisition of water and essential nutrients. However, anthropogenic effects on the environment – including soil and water deterioration and contamination – could alter these relationships. In addition to these, vegetable production presents diverse problems, which could be mitigated by the use of plant-growth promoting microorganisms (PGPMs). On the soil, PGPMs could contribute to solubilize and/ or acquire essential minerals, making scarce nutrients more available to the plant. On the host, they stimulate several physiological changes that could lead to better growth and render the plant more tolerant to abiotic stresses. Amongst PGPMs, Azospirillum is one of the most studied genera. Even though it colonizes different plant species in an ample variety of soils, its favourable effects on vegetable germination, emergence and growth have not been thoroughly studied. The review (Barrasi et al., 2007) describes the beneficial effects PGPM inoculation could have on vegetables growing either under normal or stressful conditions including salinity, with an emphasis on the use of Azospirillum. Focus may be made on the recent advances on Azospirillum-plant interactions and the bacterial mechanisms of plant growth promotion.
H. For sustainable soil health in order to ensure improved plant nutrient status and its use by the plants the importance of improved soil quality in the coastal plains through higher SOC level of the soils, for which C sequestration is one of the important pathways, may be emphasized since lowlying coastal soils may be a useful sink for higher organic carbon pool for the terrestrial system.
I. Based on earlier observations on acid sulphate soils attempt may be made, in the absence of soil liming, to explore the utility of organic wastes which may improve the performance of Al-tolerant crops while permitting the cultivation of more Al-sensitive crops on these soils. Further research should aim at identifying most appropriate substrate types and application rates for specific acid soil conditions and crop tolerance levels.
REFERENCES
Abdul-Kadir, S.M. and Paulsen, G.M. (1982). Effect of salinity on nitrogen metabolism in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition 5: 1141.

Alam Syed Manjoor (1999). Nutrient uptake by plants under stress conditions. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress (2nd Edn.), Mohammad Pessarakli (ed.), pp.285-313, Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Alfocea, F.P., Estan, M.T., Caro, M. and Bolarin, M.C. (1993). Response of tomato cultivars to salinity. Plant & Soil 150: 203.

Aslam, M., Huffaker, R.C. and Rains, D.W. (1984). Early effects of salinity on nitrate assimilation in barley seedlings. Plant Physiology 76: 312.

Awad, A.S., Edwards, D.G. and Campbell, L.C. (1990). Phosphorus enhancement of salt tolerance of tomato. Crop Science 30: 123.

Bajpai, P.D. and Gupta B. R. (1979). Effect of salinisation, phosphorous fertilization and their integration on symbiosis between R. trifolii and berseen (T. alexandrirum L.). Journal of Indian Society Soil Science 27: 462-469.
Bandyopadhyay, A.K. (1989). Effect of lime, superphosphate, powdered oystershell, rock phosphate and submergence on soil properties and crop growth in coastal saline acid sulphate soils of Sundarbans. Paper presented in International Symposium on Rice Production on Acid Soil of the Tropics, held at the Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy, Sri Lanka, 26-30 Jun 1989.
Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Bandyopadhyay, A.K. and Bhagava,G.P. (1985). Characterization of soil potassium and quality intensity relationship of potassium in some coastal soils. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 3: 548-554.
Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (1990). Fertility of salt affected soils in India – An overview. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 8: 61-78.
Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Sen, H.S. and Maji, B. (1995). Reduction of sulphate salts and black colour formation in coastal saline soils of Sundarban under paddy cultivation. Proceedings National Seminar on Challenges and Opportunities of Research and Development in Coastal Agriculture, held at OUAT, Bhubaneswar, 26-29 Dec. 1995, Indian Society of Coastal Agriculture Research, CSSRI, RRS Canning, West Bengal, India.

Barrasi Carlos, A., Sueldo Rolando, J., Creus Cecilia, M., Carrozzi Liliana, E., Casanovas Elda, M. and Pereyra María, A. (2007). Azospirillum spp., a dynamic soil bacterium favourable to vegetable crop production. Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant 1(2): 68-82.

Batra, L. and Ghai, S.K. (1984). Effect of soil salinity and inoculation on the performance of four forage legumes. Annual Report 1984, CSSRI, Karnal, India, pp. 61-63.
Bhardwaj, K.K.R (1975). Survival and symbiotic characteristics of rhizobium in saline soil. Plant & Soil 43: 377– 385.
Buresh, R.J. and De Datta, S.K. (1991). Nitrogen dynamics and management in rice-legume cropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 45: 2-59.
Chavan, A.S. and Dongale, J.B. (1994). Nutrient deficiencies and integrated nutrient management for optimization of agricultural production. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 12(1&2): 37-45.
Chavan, P.D. and Karadge, B.A. (1980). Influence of salinity on mineral nutrition of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.). Plant & Soil 54: 5.
CSSRI (1990). Annual Report 1989-90, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India, 265p.
DARE (2003-04). Natural Resource Management (http://www.dare.gov.in/report/NATURAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT.pdf).
Deturckl, P., Weerasinghe, K.D.N., Gunarathna, D.A.B.N., Lexa, J.P. and Vlassak,K. Rice production on acid sulphate soils of Sri Lanka (http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Internet/webdocs/ilri-publicaties/publicaties/Pub53/pub53-h8.pdf).
Evans, D.D. and Rotar, P.P. (1986). Role of Sesbania in Agriculture, Boulder, Colorado, USA: West View Press.
Gibson,T.S. (1988). Carbohydrate metabolism and phosphorus/salinity interactions in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant and Soil 111: 25-35.
Haefele Stephan and Hijmans Robert (2009). Soil quality in rainfed lowland rice. Rice Today January-March: 31.
Hassan, N.A.K., Drew, J.V., Knudson, D. and Olson, R.A. (1970). Influence of soil salinity on production of dry matter and uptake and distribution of nutrients in barley and corn. 1. Barley. Agronomy Journal 62: 43.

Hassouna, M. S., Madkour, M. A., Helmi, S. H. E. and Yacout, S. I. (1995). Distribution of diazotrophs in relation to soil salinity in the northern west coast of Egypt. Alexandria Journal of Research 40: 365-388.
Hodson, M.J., Smith, M.M., Wainwright, S.J. and Opik, H. (1982). Cation cotolerance in a salt-tolerant alone of Agrostis stolonifera L. New Phytology 90: 253.

Hunt, P.G., Campbell, R.B., Sojka, R.E. and Parsons, J.E. (1981). Flooding-induced soil and plant ethylene accumulation and water status response of field-grown tobacco. Plant & Soil 59(3): 427-439.
Keating, B.A. and Fisher, M.J. (1985). Comparative tolerance of tropical grain legumes to salinity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36(3): 373-383.
Kundu, D.K. and Pillai, K.G. (1992). Integrated nutrient supply system in rice and rice based cropping systems. Fertilizer News 37(4): 35-41.
Lahaye, P.A. and Epstein, E. (1971). Calcium and salt tolerance by bean plants. Plant Physiology 25: 213.

Maas, E.V. (1986). Salt tolerance of plants. Applied Agricultural Research 1: 12-26.

Mahmoud, S.Z., El – Hadidy, T., Abdel Hafez, A. and Anter, F. (1972). Microbiological changes during reclamation of the soils of the new Vally area. Proceedings International Symposium on Salt-affected Soils, held at Cairo, 1972, pp. 939– 952.
Maji, B. and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (1991). Micro nutrient research in coastal salt affected soils. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 9: 219-223.
Mandal Biswapati, Kundu, C. and Sarkar Dibyendu (2008). Soil organic carbon for maintenance of soil quality. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 26(1): 28-35.
Mongia, A.D., Ganeshamurthy, A.N. and Bandyopadhyay, A.K. (1989). Acid sulphate soils of Andamans and their potential for lowland rice production. Paper presented in International Symposium on Rice Production on Acid Soil of the Tropics, held at the Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy, Sri Lanka, 26-30 June 1989.
Neue, H.U. and Lantin, R.S. (1994). Micronutrient toxicities and deficiencies in rice. In Soil Mineral Stresses: Approaches to Crop Improvement, A.R. Yeo & T.J. Flowers (eds.), pp. 175-200, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Niazi, M.L.K., Mohmood, K., Mujtaba, S.M. and Malik, K.A. (1992). Salinity tolerance in different cultivars of barley (Hordium vulgare L.). Biologia Plantarum 34: 30.

Page, A.L., Chang, A.C. and Adriano, D.C. (1990). Deficiencies and toxicites of trace elements. In Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management, K.K.Tanji (ed.), pp. 138-160, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71, ASCED.

Papadopoulos, I. and Rendig, V.V. (1983). Interactive effects of salinity and nitrogen on growth and yield of tomato plants. Plant & Soil 73: 47.

Pillai, R. N. and Sen, A. ( 1966). Salt tolerance of R. trifolii. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 36: 80-84.
Pillai, R. N. and Sen, A. ( 1973). Salt tolerance of Rhizobium from Dolichos lablab. Zbl. Bakt. Abt. II 128: 538- 542.
Quijano-Guerta, C., Kirk, G.J.D., Portugal, A.M., Bartolome VI and McLaren, G.C. (2002). Tolerance of rice germplasm to zinc deficiency. Field Crops Research 76: 123–130.
Rao, D.L.N. (1986). Sesbania for green manuring. Brochure 7, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India, 6p (Limited distribution).
Reddy, M.P. and Iyengar, E.R.R. (1999).Crop responses to salt stress: seawater application and prospects. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress (2nd Edn.), Mohammad Pessarakli (ed.), pp.1041-1068, Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Rupela, O. P. and Tauro, P. (1973). Isolation and characterization of Thiobacillus from alkali soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 5: 891- 897.

Saleh Esam, Becker1 Mathias, Ni, D.V. and Tinh, K.V. Biogas Sludge Reduces Aluminium Toxicity and Improves Tubers. In The Global Food & Product Chain—Dynamics, Innovations, Conflicts, Strategies (http://www.tropentag.de/2005/abstracts/links/Saleh_gFbcXBF1.pdf).

Scandalios, J.G. (1993). Oxygen stress and superoxide dismulases. Plant Physiology 101: 7.
Sen, H.S. and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (1987). Volatilization loss of nitrogen from submerged rice soil. Soil Science 143: 34-39.
Sen, H.S., Bandyopadhyay, B.K., Maji B., Bal A.R. and Yadav, J.S.P. (2000). Management of coastal agro-ecosystem. In Natural Resource Management for Agricultural Production in India, J.S.P. Yadav & G.B. Singh (eds.), pp. 925-1022, Indian Society of Soil Science, New Delhi.

Shang Deng-hui, Chen Xi-pan and Gu Rong-sain (1987). The cultivation of Azolla filiculoides for the reclamation of heavy saline soil: Azolla utilization. Proceedings Workshop on Azolla Use, held at IRRI, Philippines, 1987, 174p.

Sharma, P. and Swarup, A. (1988). Effects of short-term flooding on growth, yield and mineral composition of wheat on sodic soil under field conditions. Plant & Soil 107: 137- 143.

Sharpley, A.N., Meisinger, J.J., Power, J.F. and Suarez, D.L. (1992). Root extraction of nutrients associated with long-terms soil management. In Advances in Soil Science, B. Steward (ed.), pp. 151-217, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Singh Yadvinder, Khind, C.S. and Singh Vijay (1991). Efficient management of leguminous green manures in wetland rice. Advances in Agronomy 45: 135-139.
Sirry, A. R., Salem, S. H., El-Gewaily, E. M. and EL-zamik, F. J. (1980). Effect of soil reclamation on the symbiotic relationship between Rhizobium and some leguminous plants. Proceedings International Symposium on Salt-affected Soils, held at CSSRI, Karnal, India, 1980, pp. 461-471.

Song, J.Q. and Fujiwara, H. (1996). Ameliorative effect of potassium on rice and tomato subjected to sodium salinization. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 42: 493.
Szabolcs, I. (1979). Review of research in salt-affected soils. Natural Resource Research 15, UNESCO, Paris, 137p.
Velayutham, M., Sarkar, D., Reddy, R.S., Natarajan, A., Shiva Prasad, C.R., Challa, O., Harindranath, C.S., Shyampura, R.L., Sharma, J.P. and Bhattacharya, T. (1998). Soil resources and their potentials in coastal areas of India. Paper presented in National Seminar on Frontiers of Research and its Application in Coastal Agriculture, held at Gujarat Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, 16-20 Sep 1998, Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research, CSSRI, RRS Canning, West Bengal, India.
Yadav, J.S.P., Bandyopadhyay, A.K. and Bandyopadhyay, B.K. (1983). Extent of coastal saline soils of India. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 1(1): 1-6.
Yadav, J.S.P. (2008). Sustainable management of coastal ecosystem for livelihood security: a global perspective. Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research 26(1): 5-11.

No comments:

Post a Comment